Blog

What do you think about when you hear the term sexual harassment? Sexual harassment in employment is often believed to involve unwanted comments, contact or attention towards females by male perpetrators. Sexual harassment may be thought of in this way as a result of statistics that have shown there to be more reports of sexual harassment in the workplace by females (approximately 43%) than males (approximately 12%). This idea of sexual harassment is a big misconception. Liz Bernier shares in the September 7, 2015 edition of the
Canadian HR Reporter that reports of sexual harassment against men have been increasing in recent years. Men have always been targets of sexual harassment in the workplace but have failed to report cases in fear of being ridiculed for their perceived lack of masculinity. This has been most prevalent in male dominated workplaces. Bernier reports that while females are typically harassed by males because of their sexuality, males are harassed more often by other males who are attempting to “police” gender norms.
Continue Reading

The line between personal and professional lives has gotten blurry. With increased social media usage in the workplace (read more about that on our blog here), and business communications now accessed by smartphones around the clock, it has become harder and harder to keep the two worlds separate. Yet when it comes to relationships in the workplace, the lines between personal and professional need to remain clear. Office romances may have become more common and less taboo than they once were, but the risks are ever-present. Attitudes on workplace romances are changing and evolving. According to latest numbers from both Canadian and US sources, between 40 to 50 percent of workers have dated a co-worker, with almost a third of those individuals admitting they have done so more than once. Yet it is important to understand the risks of engaging in such conduct, as office relationships that end badly can spiral far beyond the parties involved.
In the spirit of the holiday, we wanted to take a closer look at office romance, and how you can protect your business from getting too deep into the mix. It may be Valentine’s Day and love is in the air…but should it really be in the air around the photocopier?
Continue Reading

The Toronto Star investigative reporting team has been keeping busy. First, they unearthed the drug scandals of former mayor Rob Ford. Next came the unleashing of the Jian Ghomeshi scandal, which was based largely on months of tracking the radio personality. The Star’s investigation has since led to Ghomeshi’s termination, several suspensions by his employers at the CBC, and most recently criminal charges (read more about that on our blog here).

We all live our lives bound by a series of contracts. Whether we buy a house, a car, get married, buy something, sell something, there’s usually some sort of contractual relationship at the forefront. It seems only natural, if not idealistic, that two parties entering into a contract would treat each other honestly, and deal in good faith. Yet until last month, only a few types of contracts actually required good faith and honesty from the parties.
Now, in a new decision from the Supreme Court called Bhasin v Hrynew, the Court ruled that all contracts have an implied duty of good faith, and a duty to act honestly. The decision not only clarifies contract law going forward, but could also have a tremendous impact on any contractual relationships in the future.